אוניברסיטת בן גוריון – אריה ארנון (החוג לכלכלה) הכלכלן המרקסיסטי, מסלף עובדות בסיכום העשור שלו
אם למדנו משהו בעשור המבוזבז (שאלו את אולמרט), הוא שנקודת ההתחלה והסיום בפשרה הטריטוריאלית נמצאת קרוב מאוד לגבולות "הקו הירוק". לכן המסכות שנפלו אז חשפו כי מי שרוצה שלום ו"שתי מדינות" חייב לקבל נסיגה לגבולות ההם; חלוקת הארץ 77% לנו 23% להם ופשרה בבירה.
במקום לשאול אם יש פרטנר, צריך לשאול אם ישראל מסכימה לתוכנית קלינטון. ממשלת נתניהו אינה מסכימה לתנאים שבתוכנית. הקואליציה, המונהגת על ידי השביעייה, אומרת בגלוי שזו אינה פשרה שמקובלת עליה. הם רוצים אולי הסכם בתנאים אחרים, אך אפילו אינם אומרים מהם.
לפרטים נוספים ולמאמר המקורי עקוב אחר הלינק כאן
Im Tirtzu Activists protest anti-Semitic one-sided “conference” on the conduct of IDF combat soldiers during Operation Cast Lead hosted at the Van Leer Institute
A group of activists from the student organization Im Tirtzu held a demonstration outside a Rabbis for Human Rights conference at the Van Leer Institute in Jerusalem on Wednesday. The conference is focusing on the conduct of IDF combat soldiers during last January's Operation Cast Lead in the Gaza Strip. Holding up signs that decried "Blood libels against IDF soldiers for the sake of European cash," the activists heckled participants arriving at the conference and explained to curious passersby that they were unnerved by the one-sided testimonies being given inside the conference and the apparent lack of factual data backing up the claims.
For more details and to see the full original article, go here
Bashir Bashir denies that Palestinians ever accepted the UN's 1948 Partition Plan and considers all of Israel as occupied
The Palestinian national project wanted the one-state solution from the very beginning. The Palestinians were saying, "This is Palestine, Israel is an occupying power, Zionism is a colonizing movement. We need to put an end to the occupation but we are open and keen to having Jewish Palestinians (as a part of a single state). They would be as Christians and Muslims." They were motivated by the idea of a secular, democratic state. ... Here the Palestinians say, "Listen, we have given up 70 to 80 percent of historic Palestine. Now, we are willing to offer the state of Israel and the Zionist movement that we want only 22 percent of historical Palestine -- which is Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem."
For more details and to see the full original article, go here
Yossi Dahan trashes Israel at the "Socioeconomic Seminar on Theories of Social Justice" - Summary - March 4, 2008
On Tuesday, March 4, the Van Leer Institute held a "Socioeconomic Seminar on Theories of Social Justice." The featured speaker was Yossi Dahan, who discussed his new book (in Hebrew) Theories of Social Justice. Dahan, who teaches at the Ramat Gan (Tel Aviv) Academic College of Law and at Israel's Open University, is a radical activist who is on the Board of Directors of the left-wing Adva Center in Tel Aviv. Dahan is also a member of Hakeshet Hademokratit Hamizrahit (Eastern Democratic Rainbow), a splinter group of Sephardic Israelis that views Israel as an oppressor both of Arabs and of Sephardim.
Dahan flaunts his blame-Israel-for-everything mentality on his website Haoketz.org. "The Hizballah organization," he grouses, "didn't exist before Israel's invasion of Lebanon in 1982 and began its attacks only after that." Technically true, but Dahan neglects to say that Israel had then entered Lebanon because of constant shelling of its northern communities by another terror organization, the PLO, and that the explanation for Hizballah's rise is not complete without mentioning the advent three years earlier of a fanatically anti-Israeli, anti-Jewish, and anti-Western theocracy in Tehran.
Regarding the Second Lebanon War (2006), too, Dahan sounded more like a foreign propagandist than an Israeli sympathetic to his country's dangers and dilemmas: "In the distant past, an Israeli minister would have been apologetic about 'harm to innocent victims,' a statement that is part of etiquette for those who claim to represent a collective that's subject to any moral rules and restrictions whatsoever; he would have mumbled something about not intending to harm civilians and expressed regret. These days the Israeli ministers run after the television cameras and declare to the reporters that the current death and destruction are just the beginning."
This is a leering, deeply disloyal commentary on a war that was imposed on Israel by the kidnapping and murder of its soldiers, and shelling of its civilians, in sovereign Israeli territory and that evoked a widespread patriotic response from almost all of the Israeli population. Almost all Israelis understood the pressures imposed on Israel by Hizballah's positioning of its fighters, weapons, and even rocket launchers in civilian neighborhoods. Dahan's take on the situation was no different from that of Israel's worst defamers abroad.
Also in the summer of 2006, when Israeli forces were battling terrorists in Gaza in the wake of Hamas's abduction of the Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit and murder of two other Israeli soldiers in a raid on sovereign Israeli territory, a group called 4Gaza circulated a petition that described the Israeli actions in Gaza as monstrous aggression and concluded:
We protest and demand
From the Israeli government and the IDF:
Stop the carnage!
Stop the destruction!
Stop the siege on the Gaza strip.
The signers, who numbered over a thousand and included Noam Chomsky, world-famous Israel-basher and supporter of Holocaust deniers, also included...Yossi Dahan. In 2005 Dahan also signed a petition on behalf of Tali Fahima, an Israeli woman who was convicted for acting as a human shield for the Palestinian terrorist Zakaria Zubeidi. The petition described Fatima as an "Israeli peace activist."
The Van Leer Institute claims that it "gives expression to the wide range of opinions in Israel." So wide that the Institute feels called upon to provide a stage to an Israeli academic and activist who views Israel as a savage aggressor against innocent people, and who lauds a proterrorist Israeli traitor as a peace activist. There is no objection to discussing theories of social justice. There is a lot of objection to granting legitimacy and publicity to a fringe figure who views the state of Israel as a criminal enterprise.
