Ben Gurion University
Ben Gurion University - David Newman (Dean of Social
Science and Humanities Dept) denounces those who "leaked" the fact
that his BGU department consists of Anti-Israel Extremists devoid of
serious academic achievements; He then whitewashes the politicized
hiring process in that department
Comes perilously close
to supporting and advocating BDS
WHOEVER LEAKED the
report to the press clearly had a political agenda. It is unheard of
for such reports to be leaked or publicized before the
CHE has an opportunity
to discuss them. And the way in which it was leaked, partially and
with false information and highlights, clearly was intended to
create a hostile public atmosphere prior to the meeting of the CHE.
The report will be the subject of a specially convened meeting of
the Knesset Education Committee tomorrow – and it is clear that this
has very little to do with education, but a great deal to do with
politics.
The idea that
universities appoint faculty according to their political opinions
is the most ridiculous of all the accusations. Anyone who has the
slightest knowledge of the appointment and promotion process (be it
at Ben Gurion or Bar Ilan) will know that this is a tortuous
process, demanding a thorough review of the candidate's academic and
professional competence, his research achievements, his publication
record and letters and recommendations which are received from
academic peers throughout the world. [ROFL!! – Isracampus]
... Their
ongoing, well-funded war of attrition against freedom of debate and
academic freedom is slowly destroying
Israel's democracy and
leading academic friends around the world to think twice before
developing research links with Israeli universities and academics.
Academics who have refused up until now to be part of the boycott
campaign are now turning against Israel because of the country's
growing international image as a place where people, and now entire
departments, with the "wrong" political views are being silenced and
threatened by the activities of these extremist right-wing groups.
http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Op-EdContributors/Article.aspx?id=248245
An academic lynching
Whoever leaked the Committee for Higher Education report to the
press clearly had a political agenda.
By DAVID NEWMAN
05/12/2011
I have never had the
occasion to meet Education Minister Gideon Sa'ar, but he entered my
life in two very different ways during this past week.
The first instance was
when he attended the meeting of the Council for Higher Education for
its much publicized debate about the professional reports relating
to the country's departments of political science, following the
recommendations of the international committee.
As faculty
dean,
and one of the two founders of the Politics and Government
Department at Ben-Gurion University, I obviously had an interest in
the outcome of the meeting. One of my responsibilities is to read
the professional reports of all of the international committees –
about five disciplines are chosen each year for review – and,
together with my colleagues and university rector, to implement the
recommendations and conclusions of these reports.
The second occasion
was when Sa'ar visited the community of Meitar, north of
Beersheba, to attend
the opening of the new building of the national
religious
school, Hemdat, in
which all four of my children were students at one point. I was
almost a founder of this school, moving to this community just one
year after the school had been founded, at a time when it operated
out of an uninhabited house and before it had received formal
recognition from the Ministry of Education.
A journalist present
at the school dedication ceremony asked the minister why he was so
intent on making political accusations against an academic
department which was, according to the press, overloaded with
left-wing opinions, but never made any similar statements about the
right-wing nationalism which is often apparent in the
nationalreligious
school system.
That would include the
institutions that spawned Yigal Amir, such as the nationalreligious
school system or even
Bar Ilan University, which has been accused by some academics of
preventing the appointment or promotion of lecturers with left-wing
views.
It was perhaps an
inappropriate question at the dedication ceremony of a new school
building, but the minister's blatant political intervention of late
in academia made it highly relevant.
Sa'ar, who by default
is also the head of the Council for Higher Education, rarely attends
the meetings of that body, but he made a point of doing so last
Wednesday when the committee reports on the departments of political
science were being discussed. Then, he steered the discussion in the
direction that he chose and then, as soon as the report on
Ben-Gurion University
was completed, got up and left.
It was clear to all
those present that his presence at the meeting had been for the sole
purpose of attacking political views with which he did not agree via
the manipulation of so-called academic and professional guidelines.
Even more surprising
in this particular incident is that almost no one, including the
minister, had actually read the report. Instead, they relied on
sensationalist headlines in the press which were based on leaked,
partial copies of the report. Anyone actually taking the time to
read the 20-page report will immediately see that there is no
connection
whatsoever between the
political affiliations of some of the faculty members to the future
functioning of the department.
The major criticism of
the committee was that a department with so few full-time faculty
(nine) should be fulfilling so many functions, including the
teaching of the Europe Studies program (the Jean Monnet Chair in
European Studies), the administration of the African Studies
program, the teaching of the BA program to the air force pilots and
the International MA program on the Politics of Conflict.
At the same time, with
an annual recruitment of 150 undergraduate students along with
growing numbers of research and postgraduate students, the committee
recommended that the department receive at least three or four new
fully tenured positions to cope with the workload; otherwise the
functioning of the department would have to be reconsidered and it
would probably have to close some programs due to lack of manpower.
Out of the 20 pages,
about three sentences are devoted to accusations of political bias.
After interviewing faculty and students and also perusing the course
curricula, the committee concluded that there is an open and free
exchange of ideas at the university, that alternative views between
faculty and students are fully tolerated and that there is
absolutely no
evidence
that the political
views of individual faculty members are forced upon students or that
their views influence the academic debate.
WHOEVER LEAKED the
report to the press clearly had a political agenda. It is unheard of
for such reports to be leaked or publicized before the
CHE has an opportunity
to discuss them. And the way in which it was leaked, partially and
with false information and
highlights,
clearly was intended to create a hostile public atmosphere prior to
the meeting of the CHE. The report will be the subject of a
specially convened meeting of the Knesset Education Committee
tomorrow – and it is clear that this has very little to do with
education, but a great deal to do with politics.
The idea that
universities appoint faculty according to their political opinions
is the most ridiculous of all the accusations. Anyone who has the
slightest knowledge of the appointment and promotion process (be it
at Ben Gurion or Bar Ilan) will know that this is a tortuous
process, demanding a thorough review of the candidate's academic and
professional competence, his research achievements, his publication
record and letters and recommendations which are received from
academic peers throughout the world.
The selection
committees are composed of diverse faculty members, from different
disciplines and with a variety of political views, none of which are
ever brought to bear in the highly professional discussions and
decisions.
Of course, right-wing
groups such as Im Tirtzu, Academic Monitor and IsraCampus have had a
field day. They argue that the reports published in the media have
vindicated their arguments about political bias within the country's
universities and particularly the Sociology and Political Science
Departments.
Their ongoing,
well-funded war of attrition against freedom of debate and academic
freedom is slowly destroying
Israel's democracy and
leading academic friends around the world to think twice before
developing research links with Israeli universities and academics.
Academics who have refused up until now to be part of the boycott
campaign are now turning against Israel because of the country's
growing international image as a place where people, and now entire
departments, with the "wrong" political views are being silenced and
threatened by the activities of these extremist right-wing groups.
One only has to see
the letter sent to BGU by the president of the prestigious Middle
East Studies Association this week to see the harm that is being
caused to
Israel's universities as a result of such policies and political
pressures.
The Minister of
Education has walked into the trap which the right-wing groups laid
for him. Unless, that is, he himself is an active supporter of these
dangerous trends. His activities this past week would suggest that
this may indeed be the case.
The writer is
Dean of the
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences at Ben Gurion University.
The views expressed are his alone.
|