Ben Gurion University
Ben Gurion University - Maariv Defends the Right of BGU Donors
to Refuse to Support BGU
In recent weeks, a series of malicious media attacks against the donors
to Ben Gurion University have been published by representatives of
Ben Gurion University itself. Evidently these officials believe that
smearing their own donors is a great way to up the level of their
generosity! Some of the most venomous attacks have come from David
Newman, the Dean of Humanities and Social Sciences at BGU. Newman
accuses the donors to his own university of plotting to suppress
academic freedom at BGU. He calls them McCarthyists and other foul
names. And he also smears every organization and person that dares
to criticize the many far-leftist anti-Israel extremists among the
faculty at BGU. Every conceivable form of treason should be
protected as academic freedom and freedom of speech, insist Newman
and his ilk. But anyone who dares to speak out AGAINST such tenured
treason is a "McCarthyist," someone who must be suppressed and
silenced.
Among those critics of tenured extremists, who have NO right to freedom
of speech and NO right to criticize, are the DONORS, insist Newman
and his friends.
For the first time, a major Israeli newspaper has published a defense of
those donors to Israeli universities who refuse to finance
"academic" treason, and an attack on those who smear such activist
donors.
The following is a translation of that article:
(Isracampus Translation)
http://www.nrg.co.il/online/1/ART2/233/795.html
The Right to Refuse To Donate
By Ben Dror Yemini (Deputy Editor of Maariv)
Maariv, April 19, 2011
Translation by Steven Plaut
"Academic freedom" is by and large a delusion. In the USA there are many
professorial chairs financed by donors. Some of them from Saudi
Arabia. Whenever the Saudis are involved, the researchers and the
research being carried out both toe the line. Prof. John Esposito of
Georgetown University, for example, is funded by the Saudi
Billionaire Alwaleed bin Talal (see
http://cmcu.georgetown.edu/). His seemingly "academic" opinions
are mainly political. It is true that some Jews also make
contributions, but in their case the story is
different. They are politically liberals, and so it even sometimes
happens that Jewish millionaires end up financing outright
anti-Zionists.
But when it comes to donations to Israeli universities, the donors are
lovers of Israel. These are not people who will donate to schools
and departments in America known for their venomous anti-Israel
propagandizing. So why on earth should they contribute, directly or
indirectly, to similar departments and schools operating in
Israel!!?? Why? There is no reason at all!
Over the past few weeks while on a visit to the USA I heard over and over
and over again the same message. One woman donor told me that she
cannot simply stop making contributions. But she has decided to
change tactics altogether – to contribute directly to students and
for specific deserving research projects. She is unwilling to
support universities that are themselves unwilling to act against
the plague of anti-Zionism spouting up within them.
Another donor, who also serves as the head of the "Friends of Ben Gurion
University" office, told me that he simply cannot take it any more.
He is simply leaving. He is resigning from his position and ending
all donations to Ben Gurion University. He also told me of an
additional donor who has withheld all contributions to BGU, and he
emphasized to me that numerous other donors are doing the same. Yitz
Dekel, who used to serve as the director of the offices of the
"Friends of Ben Gurion University" on the West Coast of the US, told
me that he sent an enraged letter to Rivka Carmi, president of BGU,
which included a demand that all contributions to BGU be halted.
Donors and contributors have no interest in financing anti-Israel
propaganda, even if it hides behind the veil of "academic freedom."
The SUPPRESSION of Expression
Do the donors have a right to dictate a political line? Of course not.
But the problem is exactly the reverse. The issue has nothing at all
to do with freedom of speech. The real issue is far more difficult –
it is censorship and suppression of freedom of speech. When entire
university departments morph into platforms for political
propaganda, where so many people – including faculty members and
students – are intimidated and browbeaten into keeping their mouths
shut, the real problem is not freedom of expression but
suppression of freedom of expression.
The university officials simply chant the uniform tired mantra, that it
is all an exercise of academic freedom and so we just do not
intervene. But this is an empty and meaningless pronouncement.
Because there is indeed a need for freedom of expression. However in
entire departments there is an atmosphere of persecution and
suppression, where anti-Zionism is the hegemonic ideology, all the
while pretending to be "critical" and "academic." We could go on and
on with such empty slogans.
Most of Israeli academia does indeed maintain open and free dialogue
without the outrageous anti-Zionist propagandizing. But there are
some university departments where this is simply not so. And this
cancer is spreading. The university heads know perfectly well that
there is a serious problem. They know that what is taking place is
thought control and Bolshevik-style suppression of thinking. They
know that some faculty members feel entitled to anything and
everything. And the heads of the universities are simply
A-F-R-A-I-D!! The Bolsheviks are winning. Academic freedom is being
demolished in the name of defending academic freedom.
Under these circumstances, the results should not be surprising. The
donors are fed up. If some faculty members at Israeli universities
lead the calls for a boycott against Israel, the consequence of this
will truly be a boycott! But it will be a boycott by donors against
the very same academic institutions in which this small group of
extremist academics calling for boycotts against Israel are
themselves employed! Those faculty members demand an end to
financial support in order to achieve political influence? Well,
here you have it, their comeuppance – they are getting what they
asked for!
|