Ben Gurion University
Ben Gurion University - In the pro-terror anti-Semitic web
magazine Counterpunch, on the same page alongside Holocaust Denier
"Israel Shamir," Neve Gordon (Dept of Political Science) Whines that
Making anti-Israel groups reveal what he says they already reveal is
fascist oppression
Considering that the funding of all human
rights organizations in Israel is made public each year and
scrutinized by the state auditor, the idea of creating a
parliamentary commission to inspect their income is merely a
smokescreen. The parliamentary commission's actual goal is to
intimidate Israeli rights groups and their donors and, as a result,
stifle free speech.
[This, from the Neofascist who filed a SLAPP
harassment suit against another professor to stifle free speech!]
http://counterpunch.com/gordon01132011.html
Israel's Assault on Human Rights
What Kind of Country Attacks Its Own Human Rights Groups?
By NEVE GORDON
January 13, 2011
Imagine a
college student returning to her university after spending Christmas
break at home. At the airport she logs on to the Internet to double
check some of the sources she used in her final take-home exam for
the course "Introduction to Human Rights." She gets online and
begins to surf the web; however, she soon realizes that the websites
of Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch are blocked. She
calls the service provider's 800 number, only to find out that all
human rights organizations' websites have indeed been restricted and
that they can no longer be accessed from the airport.
This, you are probably thinking, cannot happen in
the United States. Such practices are common in China, North Korea
and Syria, but not in liberal democracies that pride themselves on
the basic right to freedom of expression.
In the United States students can of course
access human rights websites, no matter where they surf from. But in
Israel, which is also known as the only democracy in the Middle
East, human rights websites as well as the websites of some extreme
right-wing organizations cannot be accessed from Ben-Gurion, the
country's only international airport.
If this attack on freedom of expression was
merely an isolated incident, one might be able to conclude that it
was a mistake. Yet the restriction of human rights websites is
actually part of a well-orchestrated assault carried out by the
current government and legislature against Israel's democratic
institutions, procedures and practices. A spate of anti-democratic
bills, now in the process of being ratified in the Israeli Knesset,
render it a crime to support any ideology that poses alternatives to
conservative interpretations of Zionism, such as support for the
notion that Israel should be a democracy for all its citizens.
In early January forty-one (versus sixteen)
Knesset members voted in favor of a proposal to establish a
parliamentary inquiry commission into the funding of Israeli human
rights organizations. MK Fania Kirshenbaum, who submitted the
proposal, accused human rights groups of providing material to the
Goldstone commission, which investigated Israel's 2008-09 Gaza
offensive.
Considering that the funding of all human rights
organizations in Israel is made public each year and scrutinized by
the state auditor, the idea of creating a parliamentary commission
to inspect their income is merely a smokescreen. The parliamentary
commission's actual goal is to intimidate Israeli rights groups and
their donors and, as a result, stifle free speech.
MK Kirshenbaum said as much when she accused the
rights organizations of being "behind the indictments lodged against
Israeli officers and officials around the world." The majority of
Knesset members supporting Kirshenbaum's proposal wish to deter
human rights organizations from making use of international human
rights law and universal jurisdiction. They thus want to deprive
Israeli rights groups of their most basic tools, the tools deployed
to criticize rights-abusive policies. They might not oppose human
rights groups, but they certainly do not want human rights work. In
their myopic minds, the problem is not Israel's unethical practices,
but the organizations that reveal them.
The ongoing delegitimization of those watchdogs
of democracy—human rights NGOs, the press and public
intellectuals—is leading Israel down a steep and slippery slope. The
next time someone travels through Ben-Gurion airport, he or she
might not be able to access the websites of Israeli rights groups
like Physicians for Human Rights and B'Tselem, not because they have
been blocked, but because the organizations have been shut down.
The question Kirshenbaum and her supporters need
to ask themselves is what kind of countries attack their own human
rights organizations? The answer is straightforward.
Neve Gordon is an
Israeli activist and the author of and author of Israel's Occupation
(University of California Press, 2008). He can be contacted through
his website
www.israelsoccupation.info
|