Editorial Article
Why does
University of Haifa sociologist Sammy Smooha cheer for Israel's
enemies?
By Lee Kaplan
www.isracampus.org.il
21/7/2009
He recently stood shoulder-to-shoulder with
Arab students waving PLO flags in a demonstration at his own
university, the University of Haifa. Those same students then
produced a calendar celebrating not only Hizballah leader Hassan
Nasrallah, but Osama bin Laden too! His name is Sammy Smooha and he
is about to end his reign as Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences
at the University of Haifa.
Smooha's curriculum vitae is actually quite
impressive in terms of conferences in his own field of sociology,
but a few things stand out. These include his connections to groups
in the European Union that are dead set against Israel, as well as
some financial support from
the Ford Foundation that never met a Palestinian NGO supporting
terror it didn't like.
It's not just that Smooha embraces anti-Israel
Arab elements and supports them in their attacks on Israel's
existence. It's that he feels that Israel as a Jewish state is
nothing more than an "ethnic democracy" for Jews, by which he means
something BAD. He has built his career on claims that Oriental or
Sephardic Jews are victims of discrimination in Israel. He has
demonstrated little interest in the plight of Oriental Jews being
bombed and rocketed by Palestinians in Sderot and Netivot in
Israel’s south.
Smooha is among a powerful clique of modern
sociologists in Israel who feel their studies must be critical of
the Jewish state’s existence. Another sociologist from the Shalem
Center at Hebrew University, Alek Epstein (a liberal who refuses to
serve in the IDF yet!) has done a comprehensive study of Israeli
sociologists like Smooha. In a hard-hitting
article, Epstein examined 501 research studies that were presented
at Israeli sociology conferences between 1998-2002, observed the
researchers, and their analyses. Epstein later characterized his
findings as the
"betrayal of the sociologists" with Sammy Smooha smack at the
top of the list.
Epstein discovered that few
of the abstracts presented by Israeli sociologists at national
conferences had to do with current needs of Israeli society and that
many were "from a post-Zionist, if not anti-Zionist, perspective."
None of these articles addressed topics of genuine pertinence to
Israeli society, according to Epstein.
Smooha himself frequently today laments for the
Palestinian Arab population within Israel and next door in the
Palestinian Authority, but loses any sociological sense when he
expands his love for the perceived "underdogs" of Israeli society.
The truth is that the field of sociology in
Israel during the last decade has built itself on being intensely
critical of Israeli society, as if in some vacuum where Israel is
not surrounded by 22 Arab states plus Iran literally hell-bent on
the Jewish state's annihilation. Smooha, whose PhD is from
leftist-leaning UCLA (this author is a UCLA grad, the same year as
Smooha, and who also took many humanities courses there), brings to
Israel from abroad a biased politicized educational ideology.
Recently, Smooha attained international
prominence while participating in an international conference at
York University in Canada dedicated to Israel’s extermination. The
symposium was entitled
Israel/Palestine: Mapping Models of Statehood and Paths to Peace
and Smooha, accompanied by some Arab
professors and Israeli anti-Zionist academics discussed
the need for one single state in place of the two state “solution”
as a formula for “peace.” The “one-state” solution would solve
the problem of Jewish existence in the Middle East pretty much the
way Rwanda solved its bi-national problems. The “one-state solution”
is little more than a call to dismantle Israel to create an Islamic
state where Jews and Arabs live “equally” under an Arab majority.
Among the 43 “scholars” at this Canada
conference were assorted International Solidarity Movement activists
and anti-Israel/anti-Semitic activists from around the world like
Ali Abunimah and Mazen Qumsiyeh, who founded
Al Awda, all opposed even to two states for two peoples if one
of those peoples is the Jews!
Smooha’s presentation at that conference
reclaimed that even the majority of Arab-Israelis are not opposed a
two state solution. Smooha proposed though that a one state solution
“for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict can considerably be
strengthened if the Israeli segment of the Palestinian people (1.1
million, one-seventh of the world Palestinian population, 16.5% of
Israel's citizen population) rejects Israel and its minority status
in it and if Israeli Jews are amenable to renouncing their
commitment to Jewish state.” In other words, he isn’t necessarily
against a single Arab Moslem state replacing Israel as a “solution.”
He just thinks it’s not possible right now unless Jewish-Israelis
agree and Arab-Israelis cooperate. He also exaggerates the
“Palestinian” world population as supposedly being nearly 8 million
people,
a totally fictitious number invented by the PLO and Hamas.
Dr. Alek Epstein of the Shalem Center
has adroitly explained the origins of the Smoohas in Israel's
sociology world as "dedicated to advancing their ideology that they
have come to focus far more on rewriting Israel's history than on
examining the issues of the greatest concern to Israeli society
today. Their proclivity for myth-smashing, coupled with their
commitment to imported theoretical models preclude any serious
discussion of the unique aspects of Israeli life and cause them to
downplay, or even distort, historical facts. These problems are so
acute that they call into question the credibility of sociological
research in Israel. Although criticism is no doubt an essential
research tool-a fact of which traditional sociologists were well
aware-its employment in the service of ideology serves not only to
de-legitimize what was once a prestigious academic discipline, but
also to alienate sociology from the society it purports to study.
Given the field's role in shaping society's self-perception and the
impact its students later have on Israeli public life, ‘critical
sociology’ is something Israelis cannot afford to ignore."
And while common Israelis duck Qassems and
Katyushas in Sderot and Ashkelon, Smooha and his fellow sociologists
can gather overseas to discuss the need for a single Arab state to
replace Israel.
========================================
Op-Ed articles appearing on IsraCampus.Org.il are those of the writer and
do not necessarily represent the opinion of IsraCampus.Org.il
|