|
Home
About IsraCampus
Search
עברית
Русский
Ben Gurion U
Hebrew U
Tel Aviv U
U of Haifa
Other Schools
A-C
D-G
H-K
L-N
O-R
S-V
W-Z
Israeli Academic Extremism
Israeli Academic Extremists outside
Israel
Anti-Israel Petitions Signed by Israeli
Academics
ALEF Watch
IDI Watch
IsraCampus Essays
How to Complain
Contact Us |
Tel Aviv University
Isracampus Nomination for Israel's Stupidest Academic of the
Year: Tel Aviv University - Aeyal Gross (Dept of Law) leads the
campaign to denounce Israel for "Pinkwashing", Gross' nonsense word
for mentioning the decent treatment of homosexuals in Israeli
society
Gross fears it could
lead to Israel being Respected and Admired
Not only is
the LGBT community being appropriated, but so are the Palestinians.
Oren claimed in his speech that Israel provide asylum for LGBT
Palestinian organizations that cannot freely operate in the
territories. In reality, Israel has refused to take in LGBT
Palestinians....
While the headquarters of two LGBT
Palestinian organizations that operate in both Israel and in the
West Bank are located in Israel, the state does not give them
"shelter," and their appropriation for Israel's propaganda needs is
outrageous – not only because of the ongoing oppression of
Palestinians in Israel and in the territories, but also because the
appropriation is done in order to divert the conversation from
Palestinian oppression in an attempt to present Israel as a liberal
democracy.
http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/michael-oren-pinkwashes-the-truth-about-israel-and-gay-palestinians-1.429248
Michael Oren pinkwashes the truth about
Israel and gay Palestinians
The appropriation of gay rights
in Israel diverts the conversation from Palestinian oppression in an
attempt to present Israel as a liberal democracy.
By Aeyal Gross
May.09, 2012
After she won the 1998
Eurovision competition, Israeli pop star
Dana International
was asked about the potential conflict between the fact that she
represented the "Jewish state" and the fierce opposition by the
religious to gay, lesbian and transgender people. Her response was
that she was chosen to represent the State of Israel, not the Jewish
state. According to Dana, Israel includes citizens of all kinds and
sexes, Jews and Arabs. "I represent anyone who wants to be
represented by me," Dana said.
Thus, Dana International went
against the exclusionary outlook of nationalism and representation,
while deconstructing the idea that representation is necessarily
based on ethnic nationalism and identity. Instead, she expressed
support for a postmodern outlook according to which she represents
those who want to be represented by her. But now, even this kind of
representation is being appropriated by the Israeli propaganda
machine. In a speech given at the
Equality Forum in
Philadelphia, Israeli Ambassador Michael Oren listed Dana
International as one part in a body of evidence that points to
Israel's support for the LGBT community.
And if Oren's bit about Dana
speaks to the appropriation that was, a different part of his speech
constitutes a rewriting of the facts for the sake of waving gay
rights as a fig leaf, perhaps the last for Israeli democracy, in
order to obscure the injustices of the occupation. In both his
speech as well as in an interview given later, Oren clamed that
Israel was fighting for gay rights before the 1967 war. Perhaps Oren
should be reminded that in 1967, and actually until 1988, homosexual
intercourse was considered illegal under Israeli law. Despite the
fact that the Attorney General issued instructions not to use that
law when the subjects in question are men in a consensual
relationship back in the 1950s, the shadow of discrimination has
never really disappeared.
Israel did not fight for the
rights of gays, not in the sixties nor in the seventies. Only at the
end of the eighties and in the nineties, in the wake of vigorous
activism on the part of members of the LGBT community and a small
number of politicians who supported them, did any progress take
place. This included the cancelation of the criminality of
homosexual intercourse and the creation of a law and a ruling that
would prevent discrimination. Now, said progress, part real and part
imagined, is being appropriated for Israeli hasbara.
Not only is the LGBT community
being appropriated, but so are the Palestinians. Oren claimed in his
speech that Israel provide asylum for LGBT Palestinian organizations
that cannot freely operate in the territories. In reality, Israel
has refused to take in LGBT Palestinians. A report published in 2008
by the Refugee Rights Clinic of Tel Aviv University describes
Israel's refusal to even weigh the requests for asylum by LGBT
Palestinians. While the headquarters of two LGBT Palestinian
organizations that operate in both Israel and in the West Bank are
located in Israel, the state does not give them "shelter," and their
appropriation for Israel's propaganda needs is outrageous – not only
because of the ongoing oppression of Palestinians in Israel and in
the territories, but also because the appropriation is done in order
to divert the conversation from Palestinian oppression in an attempt
to present Israel as a liberal democracy.
The protesters, among them
Israelis, were right to blame Oren for what is known across the
world as "pinkwashing." Now, with Pride Month is just around the
corner, the question that the Israeli LGBT community faces is
whether or not it will participate in Oren's tactics, under the
framework known as "homo-nationalism," or to celebrate the
achievements and progress toward equality of the LGBT community in
Israel, out of a commitment to equality for anyone who suffers
oppression and discrimination, including the Palestinian community.
========================================
Op-Ed articles appearing on IsraCampus.Org.il are those of the writer and
do not necessarily represent the opinion of IsraCampus.Org.il
|