Tel Aviv University
Tel Aviv University – Anat Matar
(Dept of Philosophy) – Nothing is unpardonable, not even treason and
murder
The heart skips a beat every
time news leaks about progress in the talks on releasing abducted
soldier Gilad Shalit. This week we were again told that the
negotiations are being energetically pursued, so our hopes rose
again. But like so many times in the past, another source says one
of the stumbling blocks is Israel's opposition to releasing any of
its citizens as part of a prisoner exchange. … Israel sees Hamas'
demand to free these people as crass interference in its internal
affairs… A good example is that of Mahmad and Mahmoud Jabarin,
residents of Umm al-Fahm serving long terms for murdering a
collaborator, whereas their accomplices in the killing, residents of
Palestinian areas, were released almost 10 years ago.
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1129997.html
A superfluous show of sovereignty
By Anat Matar
23/11/2009
The heart skips a beat every
time news leaks about progress in the talks on releasing abducted
soldier Gilad Shalit. This week we were again told that the
negotiations are being energetically pursued, so our hopes rose
again. But like so many times in the past, another source says one
of the stumbling blocks is Israel's opposition to releasing any of
its citizens as part of a prisoner exchange. Who are these prisoners
and why is Hamas demanding their release? Information on them might
help focus the campaign for Shalit's release and transform if from
an improvised effort, full of empathy and good intentions but
without defined content, into a clear demand for action.
Currently around 130
Palestinian citizens of Israel are incarcerated as security
prisoners. Hamas does not insist that they all be released, but is
concentrating on the 22 who have been in jail for more than 15
years, much longer than the average for offenders sentenced to life.
Most of them were imprisoned before the Oslo Accords. None are Hamas
members. Some are serving life sentences, although they were not
convicted of murder or manslaughter. In most cases, a minimum term
before eligibility for parole has not been set, in others it has
been set at 40 or 45 years.
Israel sees Hamas' demand to
free these people as crass interference in its internal affairs, but
it also ignores the prisoners' pleas for parole, for the typical
one-third of their sentences to be cut for good behavior, for
furloughs so they can attend weddings or funerals of relatives, for
conjugal visits with their spouses, or similar needs. As a result,
their distress is close to all Palestinians' hearts. This is
precisely the reason Hamas refuses to let the matter drop.
About two years ago, the
long-serving security prisoners who are Israeli citizens wrote an
emotional appeal to Knesset members. They quoted former Supreme
Court president Aharon Barak on every prisoner's right in a decent
society to hope for a chance to return to freedom. They do not have
this right, they contend, with their fate falling between two
stools: They are treated like any Palestinian prisoner behind bars
for a security offense, but when Palestinians are released in
various political deals, they are left out.
A good example is that of
Mahmad and Mahmoud Jabarin, residents of Umm al-Fahm serving long
terms for murdering a collaborator, whereas their accomplices in the
killing, residents of Palestinian areas, were released almost 10
years ago.
"We see ourselves as citizens
of the State of Israel and we support and believe in peace and
oppose all forms of violence as a means of achieving peace," the two
wrote in their appeal to the MKs. "This is our position not because
we have suddenly become Lovers of Zion, but because we truly and
honestly want and hope for peace and we are even trying to help
achieve the end of the bloody conflict between our nation and our
state .... We believe that many citizens, when they are presented
with a picture of our plight, will be ready to join the effort and
contribute their part to change the attitude toward us in a manner
that is appropriate for a Jewish democratic state."
But this sincere and poignant
appeal to the Israeli people and its elected representatives did not
receive even minimal attention. Perhaps the time has come to listen
to it and call on the government to drop its insistence on
exercising sovereignty on this issue.
The writer lectures at Tel
Aviv University's Philosophy Department and heads the Israeli
Committee for the Palestinian Prisoners.
|