Tel Aviv University
Tel Aviv University - Chaim Gans (Dept of Law) brags
about how the TAU Law School Resists Calls for Ideological Pluralism
- Maintaining Hegemony of Far Leftist Anti-Zionists
Chaim Gans is
the far-leftist anti-Israel extremist who hates freedom of speech
and democracy so much that he led the campaign to block the Israeli
army woman colonel Pnina Sharvit-Baruch from being able to lecture
at the TAU law school.
He naturally
is also a leader in the movement to prevent people from criticizing
leftwing academic traitors.
He has a
fascinating article in Haaretz (22/8/2010). There, besides
denouncing the Im Tirtzu student group, he brags about how he was
awarded an award by fellow leftists in the law school for an
anti-Israel propaganda article he wrote. The award was paid for by
the Buchmann family, major donors to the school. In fact the Law
School is officially named the Buchmann School. Well, when the
Buchmanns learned that their award was being granted to Gans, they
contacted the Dean of Law Prof. Ariel Porat and demanded that for
balance the same award the following year should be granted to
someone from the other side of the political spectrum (meaning a
Zionist, or what Gans calls a rightwinger). Naturally in a law
school in which only leftist ideas are considered to be correct or
permitted, Porat dismissed the request from the donor rudely. The
donor then withdrew his donation. Gans is ecstatic that uniformity
of thought won yet another victory at Tel Aviv University
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/two-academic-stories-1.309436
Two academic
stories
Gideon Sa'ar's
response to the Im Tirtzu threat: "Quite apart from claims about
pluralism in Israeli academia, I denounce any move that could damage
donations to Israeli universities." In other words: Don't threaten
the money.
By Chaim Gans
22.08.10
Story number
one: Around six years ago, I received an award from the law faculty
at Tel Aviv University for a research paper I wrote. The award,
which until then was won annually by another researcher, was funded
by an important donor to the department and was named after him. My
lecture on the occasion was based on an academic paper comparing the
Law of Return to the law denying family unification to Palestinian
citizens of Israel. Both are discriminatory laws and can be seen as
means to control the demographics of Jews and Arabs in Israel.
My argument
was that discrimination in favor of Jewish immigration to Israel -
although in a somewhat humbler version than that of the current Law
of Return - would be acceptable if there were a Palestinian state
engaging in similar discrimination in favor of Palestinians. As for
preventing reunification of Palestinian families, I argued that this
would be unacceptable even if there were a Palestinian state,
because unlike the Law of Return, the family-reunification law
directly and unequivocally impinges on Israeli citizens' basic right
to set up a family where they live. For this reason, I argued, this
law is even more beyond the pale than the proposal by then-MK
Michael Kleiner to subsidize Arabs to emigrate, a proposal the
presidium of the 15th Knesset deemed so racist it barred the
parliament from even debating it.
The donor then
asked the dean, Prof. Ariel Porat, to give the award the next year
to someone whose conclusion expressed rightist positions. Porat
didn't hesitate to inform the donor that such considerations would
not play a role in choosing laureates for awards given by the
department. The laureates, said Porat, would be chosen based on the
quality of their arguments, not on the values or politics of the
conclusions. The donor canceled the award.
Story number
two: Some 15 years ago, Gideon Sa'ar, now education minister, took
part in a seminar I taught at the same department on freedom of
expression. The most difficult article we studied was a
philosophical essay that dealt with the great importance of not
limiting content, whether based on its veracity or political values.
This would preserve the legitimacy of the democratic political
authority. Sa'ar, who had no philosophical training, presented the
argument with impressive clarity.
The rest of
the story can be told using press reports. A few months ago, Sa'ar
spoke at the annual conference of Im Tirtzu, wishing the movement
every success. This week, Im Tirtzu threatened the president of
Ben-Gurion University that it would sabotage donations if the
president did not end anti-Zionist bias in the politics and
government department. Sa'ar's response to the threats: "Quite apart
from claims about pluralism in Israeli academia, I denounce any move
that could damage donations to Israeli universities." In other
words: Don't threaten the money. We'll take care of the political
content in teaching and research.
I'm no
strategic consultant and I don't know what Sa'ar needs to do to gain
power in Likud and the right wing in general. I also don't know what
the leaders of universities should do to retain their donors. If
Sa'ar wants to preserve the legitimacy of political authority in
Israel - a legitimacy he once eloquently explained as dependent on
avoiding the state's monitoring of political content - he should act
like Porat. He should most certainly act like Porat if he wants
Israel to have an academia, and the university heads should take
example from Porat all the more.
|