|
Home
About IsraCampus
Search
עברית
Русский
Ben Gurion U
Hebrew U
Tel Aviv U
U of Haifa
Other Schools
A-C
D-G
H-K
L-N
O-R
S-V
W-Z
Israeli Academic Extremism
Israeli Academic Extremists outside
Israel
Anti-Israel Petitions Signed by Israeli
Academics
ALEF Watch
IDI Watch
IsraCampus Essays
How to Complain
Contact Us |
Tel Aviv University
Tel Aviv University - Propagandist Daniel Bar-Tal (Dept of
Education) and friends Compose Pseudo-Research about the Psychology
of being an "Occupying Society"; However They Ignore Research into
Psychological Damages from being Targeted by Genocidal Terrorists
and Fascist Arab Military Aggression
Within this framework, they describe the
psychological challenges that the occupation may pose to the members
of the occupying society. Next, they introduce psychological
mechanisms that members of an occupying society may use in order to
avoid facing these challenges. Finally, they offer a number of ideas
regarding the relationship between these mechanisms and the process
of ending the occupation.
http://jpr.sagepub.com/content/47/1/59.short
Socio-psychological implications for an
occupying society: The case of Israel
Eran Halperin
Lauder School of Government, IDC Herzliya, Israel, eran.halperin@idc.ac.il
Daniel Bar-Tal
School of Education, Tel-Aviv University
Keren Sharvit
Department of Psychology, University of Maryland
Nimrod Rosler
The Swiss Centre for Conflict Research Management and Resolution,
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Amiram Raviv
Department of Psychology, Tel-Aviv University
Journal of Peace Research January 2010 vol. 47
no. 1 59-70
Abstract
Although prolonged occupation of a nation is no
longer a common phenomenon, where it does exist, it bears harsh
implications for all parties involved. This article examines the
socio-psychological implications of occupation on the occupying
society, using the case of the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian
territories of the West Bank and Gaza Strip since 1967 as an
example. The article first delineates the concept of occupation from
a socio-psychological perspective, which supplements the
legal-formal aspect. The authors then propose a conceptual framework
that analyzes the psychology of the occupying society. Within this
framework, they describe the psychological challenges that the
occupation may pose to the members of the occupying society. Next,
they introduce psychological mechanisms that members of an occupying
society may use in order to avoid facing these challenges. Finally,
they offer a number of ideas regarding the relationship between
these mechanisms and the process of ending the occupation.
|