Tel Aviv University
Tel Aviv University - Ran HaCohen (Dept of Comparative
Literature) thinks the Itamar Murders of Babies were Ok because
Israel had Built a Fence on the Land of the Murderers
The Israeli government immediately exploited
the atrocity to announce the construction of 500 new houses for
settlers. The barbarian slaughter could have been an excellent
propaganda asset—especially now that terror attacks are so seldom
and Israel is in desperate need of pretexts for entrenching its
colonialist project—were it not for the catastrophes in Japan that
started the very same day. In its frustration, Netanyahu's
government even tried to feed the international media with
snuff-style pictures of the murder, photos so horrible that the
Israeli media refused to show them (though they did become a hot
commodity among smart phone users).
http://original.antiwar.com/hacohen/2011/03/15/chronicles-of-death/
West Bank Neighbors: Chronicles of Death
by Ran HaCohen
March 16, 2011
March 11, 2011
On Friday night, two men—presumably Palestinians—entered the West
Bank Jewish settlement of Itamar. The settlement of 1,000 was
established in 1984, deep in occupied land (28 km from the Green
Line). It is named after the son of the biblical Aharon, Itamar,
whose grave—according to a 13th-century legend—is located in the
adjacent Palestinian village of Awarta (population 6,000), 8 km
southwest of Nablus.
The men entered the home of the Fogel family. Using knives, they
murdered in their sleep Udi (37), his wife, Hadas (36), and three of
their children: Yoav (10), Elad (4), and Hadas (3 months old).
The slaughter, especially appalling because of the children
massacred, was condemned by the Palestinian Authority and many
common Palestinians. The usual suspects—Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Fatah,
Al-Aqsa Brigades—have all denied involvement, giving rise to all
kinds of
rumors on the Palestinian side.
The Israeli government immediately exploited the atrocity to
announce the construction of 500 new houses for settlers. The
barbarian slaughter could have been an excellent propaganda
asset—especially now that terror attacks are so seldom and Israel is
in desperate need of pretexts for entrenching its colonialist
project—were it not for the catastrophes in Japan that started the
very same day. In its frustration, Netanyahu's government even tried
to feed the international media with snuff-style pictures of the
murder, photos so horrible that the Israeli media refused to show
them (though they did become a hot commodity among smart phone
users). The international news agencies said the pictures were
tampered with (the faces were blurred), and rejected them.
Following the slaughter, dozens of settlers from Itamar went out
to Awarta to
seek revenge. A far-right
Hebrew website reported that some of the soldiers sent to
protect the Palestinians from revenge-seeking settlers actually
instructed the settlers on how to bypass the army presence on their
way into Awarta. One soldier gave the settlers a iron baton, wishing
them good luck.
March 20, 2010
At Sunday noon, two Palestinian men from the West Bank village of
Awarta were shot dead by Israeli soldiers. Framed as "a thwarted
terrorist attack," the story was reported by
all major Hebrew news channels following army briefings. These
claimed the two men either "suddenly approached a temporary army
checkpoint" or "were detained by soldiers for a routine check"; that
they were carrying a pitchfork (or pitchforks) and a bottle (or a
broken bottle); that they declined to show identity cards and "acted
suspiciously"; that one of them assaulted the soldiers and was
consequently shot twice and killed; and that after that, the other
man assaulted the soldiers and was also shot and killed. The
soldiers "felt they were in danger" and "reacted properly to the
threat" from the Palestinians, who had "both the intention and the
means" to harm the soldiers, an army source said.
Some of the reports added that the soldiers were in fact
protecting Palestinian farmers when they were assaulted by the two,
"yet more evidence for the Palestinians' rascality," an army officer
was quoted as saying. Violent Jewish settlers regularly assault
Palestinian farmers in order
to destroy—or
steal and sell—their crops and eventually take over their lands,
as uncultivated land can be confiscated by Israel. The army has been
ordered by the courts to protect Palestinian farmer workers.
Another channel suggested the attack could be retaliation for an
event that took place the day before, when two other unarmed
Palestinians had been killed by soldiers during a demonstration near
Nablus.
Only YNet (Hebrew)
bothered to talk to Palestinian sources. They said the two
youngsters, both 19, were relatives on their way to work in the
field, carrying tools. YNet was the only venue in which the two had
names: Muhammad and Salah Qawariq.
CNN reported the event from both sides: they gave the army
version, but they also spoke to residents in the area who said the
two were innocent farm workers, as well as the head of the
Palestinian medical relief services, who said they were both shot in
the back.
Late August 2010
The bodies of the two dead teens were brought to a hospital in
Nablus. According to the medical exam, Muhammad was hit by seven
bullets and Salah was hit by three, apparently from very close
range. The Israeli army considered taking action against the
soldiers involved in the incident, but failed to begin an
investigation.
In August 2010, the Israeli human rights organization
Yesh Din submitted a petition to the High Court of Justice
calling for an investigation into the killing of two Palestinians
five months before. According to Yesh Din, "The circumstances of the
incident, in which the two teens were killed from IDF fire, raise
the suspicion of a grave criminal offense. The details of the
incident were not clarified, and there's a risk they will never be
clarified, as long as the military advocate-general continues to
refrain from deciding on the matter."
Yesh Din's petition is still pending.
How Time Passes
The settlement of Itamar is surrounded by a fence. As a 2005
appeal by the Association for Civil Rights in Israel (Hebrew)
reveals, parts of this fence run on the private land of Awarta
farmers, effectively annexing them to the settlement.
Last week the murderers jumped over the fence. The movement was
noticed by the local security forces, but the alarm was ignored. The
area had been quiet for a long while, so the guards were not on high
alert. Israeli intelligence did mark up the upcoming anniversary of
the Awarta killing—next week—as a dangerous period. However, someone
has forgotten to take into account that the Muslim lunar year is 11
days shorter than ours.
|