|
Home
About IsraCampus
Search
עברית
Русский
Ben Gurion U
Hebrew U
Tel Aviv U
U of Haifa
Other Schools
A-C
D-G
H-K
L-N
O-R
S-V
W-Z
Israeli Academic Extremism
Israeli Academic Extremists outside
Israel
Anti-Israel Petitions Signed by Israeli
Academics
ALEF Watch
IDI Watch
IsraCampus Essays
How to Complain
Contact Us |
Israelis at
Non-Israeli Universities
University of Exeter - Ilan Pappe (Dept of Israel Bashing) –
Time Has Come to Recant Outlandish Accusations
Ilan Pappé rode to fame by bashing Israel, repeatedly accusing
the Jewish state of war crimes and crying oppression when academics
actually looked at his
evidence
and
found it
lacking.
…Ignorance is no excuse for an academic, nor is stubbornness a
virtue. When Benny Morris mistreated quotes by
David Ben-Gurion and
Theodor Herzl, he was rightly pilloried for it. In December
2006, he came clean and acknowledged that the Ben-Gurion quote was
fraudulent. Kudos to him for reversing the error.
Alas, to advance his polemic, Pappé has
embraced the false Ben-Gurion quote endorsing ethnic cleansing,
an outlandish accusation. Some of those who relied on Pappé have
issued corrections, or are in the process of doing so. Not Pappé,
however. He may believe that tainting Israel with original sin
justifies his lies.
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2011/12/05/pappe-ben-gurion-quote-academic-fraud/
Does Scholar Think Anti-Israel Animus
Justifies Academic Fraud?
Michael Rubin
12.05.2011
Ilan Pappé rode to fame by bashing Israel, repeatedly
accusing the Jewish state of war crimes and crying oppression when
academics actually looked at his
evidence
and
found it
lacking. But, just as with University of Michigan Professor Juan
Cole or University of Chicago Professor John Mearsheimer, there is a
certain type of person who will cry persecution whenever critics
find arguments unpersuasive if not bordering on deranged
conspiracies. If, in Cole’s case, Yale and
Duke University turn you down, it’s not because he came off as
arrogant, did not fit the
job description, or gave a sub-par job talk; it’s because the
CIA was out to get him. Or, in Mearsheimer’s case, it was just
easier to complain that Jews were muzzling him as he took a
$750,000 book advance to the bank. That he subsequently chose to
endorse a Holocaust denier’s book certainly shouldn’t reflect on
his judgment.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with historical
inquiry, but it must be done honestly. When I was working on my Ph.D,
one of my faculty advisers quipped that theory was for people who
did not have libraries. If there was not archival evidence to
support a statement then, simply, that statement could not be made.
Ignorance is no excuse for an academic, nor is stubbornness a
virtue. When Benny Morris mistreated quotes by
David Ben-Gurion and
Theodor Herzl, he was rightly pilloried for it. In December
2006, he came clean and acknowledged that the Ben-Gurion quote was
fraudulent. Kudos to him for reversing the error.
Alas, to advance his polemic, Pappé has
embraced the false Ben-Gurion quote endorsing ethnic cleansing,
an outlandish accusation. Some of those who relied on Pappé have
issued corrections, or are in the process of doing so. Not Pappé,
however. He may believe that tainting Israel with original sin
justifies his lies. That is sad, but in the post-modern world of
modern academe, too often polemics trump truth. The question posed
recently by Dexter Van Zile, a researcher at the Committee for
Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America, is whether his home
institution, the University of Exeter, and publisher, agree.
Academics embrace free speech and, indeed, free speech should be
sacred. Such freedom, however, does not expunge poor research,
integrity, and honesty.
|